A graph-theoretic approach for segmentation of PET images
33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2011), pp. 8479–8482
Abstract
Segmentation of positron emission tomography (PET) images is an important objective because accurate measurement of signal from radio-tracer activity in a region of interest is critical for disease treatment and diagnosis. In this study, we present the use of a graph based method for providing robust, accurate, and reliable segmentation of functional volumes on PET images from standardized uptake values (SUVs). We validated the success of the segmentation method on different PET phantoms including ground truth CT simulation, and compared it to two well-known threshold based segmentation methods. Furthermore, we assessed intra-and inter-observer variation in delineation accuracy as well as reproducibility of delineations using real clinical data. Experimental results indicate that the presented segmentation method is superior to the commonly used threshold based methods in terms of accuracy, robustness, repeatability, and computational efficiency.
Abstract sourceThis 2011 conference paper presents an interactive random-walk method for segmenting functional volumes in positron emission tomography (PET) images and evaluates it using phantom and clinical data.
Summary
The paper describes an interactive graph-based segmentation method using random walks to delineate regions in PET images from standardized uptake values. The authors evaluated the approach on PET phantoms and retrospectively collected clinical PET-CT data, and compared it with two threshold-based methods. The reported evaluations address segmentation accuracy and reproducibility; they do not establish prospective clinical validation or clinical readiness. Read the paper.
Cite this work
Ulaş Bağci, Jianhua Yao, Jesus Caban, Evrim Turkbey, Omer Aras, Daniel J. Mollura (2011). A graph-theoretic approach for segmentation of PET images. 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2011), pp. 8479–8482 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6092092
BibTeX