Automatic quantification of tree-in-bud patterns from CT scans

Ulas Bagci; Kirsten Miller-Jaster; Jianhua Yao; Albert Wu; Jesus Caban; Kenneth N. Olivier; Omer Aras; Daniel J. Mollura

Proceedings / IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

Abstract

In this paper, we present a fully automatic method to quantify Tree-in-Bud (TIB) patterns for respiratory tract infections. The proposed quantification method is based on our previous effort to detect and track TIB patterns with a computer assisted detection (CAD) system [9]. In addition to accurately identifying TIB on CT, quantifying TIB is important for measuring the volume of affected lung as a potantial marker of disease severity. This quantification can be challenging due to the complex shape of TIB and high intensity variation contributing mixed features. Our proposed quantification method is based on a local scale concept such that TIB regions detected via the CAD system are quantified adaptively, and volume percentages of the quantified regions are compared to visual scoring of participating radiologists. We conducted the experiments with a data set of 94 chest CTs (laboratory confirmed 39 viral bronchiolitis caused by human parainfluenza (HPIV), 34 nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM), and 21 normal control). Experimental results show that the proposed quantification system is well suited to the CAD system for detecting TIB patterns. Correlations of observer-CAD agreements are reported as (R2 = 0.824, p < 0.01) and (R2 = 0.801, p < 0.01) for HPIV and NTM cases, respectively.

Abstract source

This 2012 study evaluated a local-scale method for quantifying tree-in-bud patterns in chest CT scans and compared computer-generated scores with radiologists’ visual assessments.

Summary

The paper describes an automatic method that combines a computer-assisted detection system with local-scale analysis to estimate the lung volume occupied by tree-in-bud (TIB) patterns—branching opacities seen on CT. The evaluation used 94 chest CT scans: 39 associated with human parainfluenza virus infection, 34 with nontuberculous mycobacterial infection, and 21 normal controls. The authors compared computer-generated scores with radiologists’ visual scores and reported correlations for the infection groups. This retrospective evaluation does not establish prospective clinical performance or readiness for clinical use. Read the paper.

Cite this work

Ulas Bagci; Kirsten Miller-Jaster; Jianhua Yao; Albert Wu; Jesus Caban; Kenneth N. Olivier; Omer Aras; Daniel J. Mollura (2012). Automatic quantification of tree-in-bud patterns from CT scans. Proceedings / IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235846

BibTeX